Snyder Family 2016 - Person Sheet
NameWilliam De Warenne , 2nd Earl of Warren & Surrey 
Birthabt 1065, Warren And Surrey, Sussex, England
Death11 May 1138, England
FatherWilliam de Warenne 1st Earl of Surrey (~1055-1088)
MotherGundred Princess of England (~1063-1085)
Spouses
Birthabt 1085, Valois, France
Death13 Feb 1131, England
FatherHugues "Le Grand" de France (~1053-1102)
MotherAdelle (Adelaide) Vermandois (~1065-~1120)
Marriagebef 1118, France
Notes for William De Warenne , 2nd Earl of Warren & Surrey
William DE WARENNE 2d Earl Of Warren & Surrey[13],[12] Isabel De Vermandois[13]
b. 1081, "of Warren And Surrey"
d. 11 May 1138, Age: 57
br. Chapter House, Lewes, Sussex
b. 1081, "of Warren And Surrey"
d. 11 May 1138, Age: 57
br. Chapter House, Lewes, Sussex
Notes for Isabel (Spouse 1)
Notes:
Weis" "Ancestral Roots. . ." (50:24), (53:24), (66:24), (83:24), (84:24),
(88:24), (89:24), (93:24), (140:24), (141:24), (151:25), (215:24).
Schwennicke (ed.) Europaische Stammtafeln, iii, 699.
She was the widow of ROBERT DE BEAUMONT, count of Meulan and Earl of Leicester. It is commonly stated that before the count's death she eloped with WILLIAM DE WARENNE, whom she later married. However,
see the following note.
Cokayne's "Complete Peerage" (Leicester, p.526 and notes b and d). Henry of Huntingdon states that she eloped with a certain earl during ROBERT's lifetime, which may refer to some scandal, but the whole trend of the letter does not inspire confidence in the facts stated therin.
Weis" "Ancestral Roots. . ." (50:24), (53:24), (66:24), (83:24), (84:24),
(88:24), (89:24), (93:24), (140:24), (141:24), (151:25), (215:24).
Schwennicke (ed.) Europaische Stammtafeln, iii, 699.
She was the widow of ROBERT DE BEAUMONT, count of Meulan and Earl of Leicester. It is commonly stated that before the count's death she eloped with WILLIAM DE WARENNE, whom she later married. However,
see the following note.
Cokayne's "Complete Peerage" (Leicester, p.526 and notes b and d). Henry of Huntingdon states that she eloped with a certain earl during ROBERT's lifetime, which may refer to some scandal, but the whole trend of the letter does not inspire confidence in the facts stated therin.